Letter to the editor: “Illegal fire tax” bills

senatortedgaines

ILLEGAL FIRE TAX BILLS ARRIVING NOW
By Senator Ted Gaines

Despite my efforts to stop it by referendum and legislation, the illegal fire tax is being assessed on more than 825,000 rural Californians starting this month, including 4,207 in Mono County.

This so-called fee was passed in 2011 to extract up to $150 per habitable structure from property owners. The tax will not provide any more fire protection and will actually make it harder for local fire agencies to raise the money they need to keep people safe. It’s a lose-lose proposition for the people in my district and for anyone concerned with public safety and the rule of law.

This tax should have been subject to a 2/3 vote in the legislature just like every other tax, but the Democrats called it a fee to get around that requirement. The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association is planning to file a lawsuit disputing the fee’s legality and I hope it gets overturned as soon as possible.

Until that happens, though, the State Board of Equalization (BOE) has already begun mailing the first bills for the new fire tax this month and hopes to have all bills sent by December. The BOE has also begun mailing an advance notice to the affected property owners to warn them that the bills are coming, and to provide them with a brochure explaining the “fee.”

No matter how many mailers or explanations or warnings any agency sends out, it doesn’t make this tax any more right or more legal. It was, is and always will be a shakedown of rural property owners that takes their money every single year but gives them zero in the way of additional fire protection.

Wildfires are currently raging out of control across the North State and they won’t be put out by the phantom protections promised in this bogus tax.  We need more firefighters, bulldozers, trucks and the other equipment that does the hard work of fighting these wildfires and protecting us, our homes and our property.  This tax leaves us no safer, only poorer and more skeptical than ever of a government that takes and spends taxpayer dollars with no regard to the law or to fairness.

I wanted to share with you several resources you can use to equip yourselves with information. Visit www.calfirefee.com  to see if you live in a “State Responsibility Area” and will be paying this tax. For questions regarding your bill, contact (888) 310-6447. For more information regarding the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association efforts, visit www.firetaxprotest.org.

Senator Ted Gaines represents the 1st Senate District, which includes all or parts of Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, El Dorado, Lassen, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento and Sierra counties.

 

17 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dingo
Dingo
10 years ago

Is it just me or does Senator Ted Gaines have a smile much like Jack Nicholson when he played The Joker in the movie “Batman”?

JaneE
JaneE
10 years ago

If the state doesn’t have enough money, it should just stop providing fire protection. This is the natural result of lowering taxes to reduce the size of government. There may be some homes, and possibly lives lost, but them’s the breaks. If it happens frequently enough to bother people, maybe… Read more »

Russ Monroe
Russ Monroe
10 years ago

Very refreshing to see an elected public official taking a position in support of his constituents. Lose/lose is an understatement regarding this unconstitutional act on the part of the state legislature. After the enormous expenditure of public funds that it will take to get the California Supreme Court rules on… Read more »

SierraFan
SierraFan
10 years ago
Reply to  Russ Monroe

It’s funny, I think our taxes are supposed to go for things this but it seems that when the cost of living (pensions and such) go up they start finding new ways of essentially double taxing or should I say triple taxing us. We pay way too much when you… Read more »

Mike
Mike
10 years ago

Instead of clearing brush that could be a potential fire threat in the SRA areas, the inmate crew under Cal Fire’s direction is trimming rose bushes at the fairgrounds. I think a reassignment of their priorities should be addressed before any new taxes are demanded

Big AL
Big AL
10 years ago
Reply to  Mike

You’re not exactly correct on that one Mike … yes they do work at the fair grounds, one or two of the crews do that work before the major events that use the fair grounds. They also go out and do other work around the area, such as what you… Read more »

Mike
Mike
10 years ago
Reply to  Big AL

They cannot do work on private land.

Mark
Mark
10 years ago
Reply to  Mike

I have seen inmate crews clear brush on private land in L.A. County. There is some type of loophole allowing handicapped property owners to get their brush cleared by these crews.

Big AL
Big AL
10 years ago

“but the Democrats called it a fee to get around that requirement” That say’s it all .. they can do what they want .. who will stop them?

politics as usual
politics as usual
10 years ago
Reply to  Big AL

Big Al and his “Republican’s are #1” speech.
As if his big party has never done the same.
A bit too much Limbaugh, there, Big Al.
LOL!

Ken Warner
Ken Warner
10 years ago

Some questions: 1) If it’s a law passed by the Legislature — how can it be illegal? 2) Won’t the money generated by it provide the, “…firefighters, bulldozers, trucks and the other equipment that does the hard work of fighting these wildfires…” called for? 3) Is it a fee or… Read more »

Benett Kessler
Benett Kessler
10 years ago
Reply to  Ken Warner

The bill language says the fee will pay for fire prevention, not fire protection.
Benett

Nancy
Nancy
10 years ago
Reply to  Ken Warner

In response to Ken’s questions: This is technically a tax; however, in order to get around voter approval they called it a fee. Also, it does not provide for any equipment or firefighters, it goes toward administrative costs to pay for fire prevention and its education. In response to JaneE:… Read more »

Ken Warner
Ken Warner
10 years ago
Reply to  Nancy

May I ask why this is technically a tax? What’s the difference between a fee and a tax?

Benett Kessler
Benett Kessler
10 years ago
Reply to  Ken Warner

Taxes have to be approved by a 2/3 vote of the legislature. This measure was approved by a simple majority.
Benett

Ken Warner
Ken Warner
10 years ago
Reply to  Benett Kessler

So it’s seems to be technically a fee right? But either way it’s public money — I don’t want to say taken — a required payment by the public for public safety. Nobody wants to pay more out of pocket yet everybody seems to want more services and protections. The… Read more »

Inyoite
Inyoite
10 years ago
Reply to  Ken Warner

A fee has to have a tangible, measurable, related, direct benefit attached to the person assessed it and can be passed by a simple majority. A tax doesn’t have to have a tangible, direct, related benefit to the person paying it, but requires a 2/3rds vote. To skirt the 2/3rds… Read more »