Rossy judge: ‘The total deserves less than the sum of its part’

(Note: This report was filed with information not in the previous press release)

By Deb Murphy

Dawndee Rossy was sentenced to nine years, minus 1,369 days served, on embezzlement and other felonies, totaling 88 charges, while employed as a supervisor in Inyo County’s Department of Health and Human Services.

The decision was handed down Tuesday by appointed Judge Philip Argento, marking the end of a four-year long case.

Argento included the time Rossy was under electronic monitoring in the credited days subtracted from the sentence, reducing the time she could serve in state prison to five and one fourth years. The sentence also requires restitution of $1.8 million, adding unpaid state taxes in excess of $272,000 to the $1.5 million embezzlement charges.

In late February, District Attorney Thomas Hardy asked for a sentence of 22 years and eight months. Defense attorney David Evans asked for proportionality, citing high-profile white-collar crimes with defendants spending significantly less than the recommended 22 years in jail.

The cases Argento took into consideration included a 12-year sentence for Bell City Administrator Robert Rizzo and probation for Inyo County Sheriff Don Dorsey, convicted of seven felonies including embezzlement of county funds in the 1980s.

“You have to look at the case as a whole,” Argento said. “The total deserves less than the sum of its part.” He also noted that the sentence would have been lower if tried in federal court. Under California law, he was required to apply enhancements to the charges.

, , , , ,

9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Buzz Killington
Buzz Killington
5 years ago

.
With prop 57 she will eligible for parole and with a high probability of being released from prison by the end of 2017.

GOOGLE PROP 57…the more you know

Rick O'Brien
Rick O'Brien
5 years ago

MP…she could do community service for the next 30 years and still not even put a dent in what she stole. AND, she didn’t get a NINE year sentence…she got a 5 year sentence, which means in reality , 2 and a half. I don’t equate home monitoring to sitting… Read more »

Earl Duran
Earl Duran
5 years ago

Maybe now she can get her teeth fixed. They look horrible in that photo. With all the money she stole. Dumb

mouthpiece
mouthpiece
5 years ago

Give me a break, slap on the wrist? A nine year prison sentence is hardly a slap on the wrist. Crime pays? I would like to see any of you last just one week in state prison. This isn’t a murder case. If it was she would probably get less… Read more »

Buzz Killington
Buzz Killington
5 years ago

Usually defendants don’t have the authority to ask D.A’s and Judges to be put on a high dollar amount of bail and also be put on electronic monitoring. So if I was you Rick O’brien, I would vent my frustration to the Inyo County District Attorney since they were the… Read more »

Rick O'Brien
Rick O'Brien
5 years ago

It’s total BS that she gets credit for the 1300 days she spent on wearing ankle monitor. That is shaving almost FOUR FREAKIN’ YEARS off of her sentence ! Is this WHY the defense dragged this out for 4 years, cause they KNEW in advance it would count when she… Read more »

Nes Lessman
Nes Lessman
5 years ago

Well kids…crime DOES pay! No wonder she has a smirk on her face for her mug shot.

BobM
BobM
5 years ago

Does the judge have any idea how she will repay the money

Steve
Steve
5 years ago
Reply to  BobM

The restitution part of the sentencing is pretty much symbolic. She would have to win the lottery before any money goes back to the county.