Mono Supervisors gird for ‘toe-to-toe’ with LADWP

By Deb Murphy

The Mono County Board of Supervisors took its first step to protect area cattlemen and 6,000 acres of grazing leases.

During a special session Thursday, the Board signed off on a letter to Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti outlining the impacts of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power’s intent to pull water from grazing leases. The meeting started with a closed session, initiation of litigation. KSRW confirmed both agenda items were related.

Last week, LADWP’s public information office stated in an e-mail the department would perform “an environmental evaluation of the proposed…ranch leases” holding over the current ranch leases until that evaluation was completed. That may take some of the pressure off the six ranching operations this year, but provides no assurance for the future.

One glaring question after last week’s discussion: what about California Environmental Quality Act review of potential damage to lands irrigated for the last 100 to 150 years. A layman’s review of CEQA regulations didn’t answer the question definitively.

Steps taken by the County, LADWP and other stakeholders to preserve bi-state sage grouse habitat kept the bird off the endangered species list. But, according to Mono County Counsel Stacey Simon, the department’s conservation plan is still being reviewed by the US Department of Fish and Wildlife. Any changes in the conditions outlined in the plan, nullify the plan. No water—no plan.

The Board’s six-page letter acknowledges LADWP’s intent to provide water until an assessment is completed, but states “the ranchers need more certainty regarding what to expect on May 1,” the start of Mono’s irrigation season.

Other issues raised in the letter included “profound and irreversible impacts on the economy, environment and cultural heritage of Mono and Inyo counties.” Referring to history of LADWP and the Eastern Sierra, the letter states “it simply shocks the conscience for LADWP to propose dewatering the last historic ranch properties (and their associated wetlands and habitat) in Mono County.

The letter cites California water law and regulations “requiring water users to petition the State Water Resources Control Board before changing the place of use of water.” It goes on to describe the “not in compliance with the City Charter” assertion as “patently absurd.”

“It’s critical how we follow through,” Supervisor John Peters said. “We have to go toe to toe” with the department.

, , ,

5 Responses to Mono Supervisors gird for ‘toe-to-toe’ with LADWP

  1. SteveH August 5, 2018 at 7:27 am #

    Its time that Los Angeles is called to task for the propagation of a century long environmental disaster upon this state. There is NO justification for LA to not have built desalination plants decades ago instead, they have captured the flows of rivers that do not belong to them and destroyed habitat and communities all to satisfy the needs of a community that has never show any inclination to live within its means. The Owens, the Colorado and Feather rivers do not flow to LA, do not belong to LA and should be retained within their natural flow geography. I hope this finally bankrupts the DWP and their politicians finally they have to comply with the environmental laws.

  2. Been there - Done that April 24, 2018 at 8:35 am #

    LA DWP – Their land, their water, their freedom to destroy:
    A ranching way of life that involves both Inyo and Mono Counties
    Habitat for birds, animals, and plants
    Carbon sequestration capacity
    DWP has done this before:
    Mono Lake – Lost in Court on both water exports out of the Mono Basin and stream
    Owens Dry Lake – Lost in court – DWP even complains about the water used on the dry
    lake even though the 2014 settlement reduced the amount of water they have to commit
    between 35% and 50%
    Owens River between the Crowley Lake Dam and Pleasant Valley – Lost in Court and
    have yet to comply with the settlement.
    Each loss has cost the City of Los Angeles money and water. If DWP proposed action is accomplished in this case the City will loose again in the end if history is a guide. It costs more to restore than maintain. Long term more water will be available from a healthy environment. Perhaps the Mono Board is trying to help DWP (City of Los Angeles) save themselves from themselves. .

  3. Tom Tuttle April 23, 2018 at 8:50 am #

    If LADWP owns the land and the water rights, what is the issue? It is their land and water, get over it.

    • Inyo Citizen April 25, 2018 at 8:34 am #

      Tom Tuttle, you comment belies a complete ignorance of how important and complex this issue is. Or you’re just another troll.

      • Inyo Citizen April 25, 2018 at 8:37 am #

        Belies is the wrong word. Exposes, rather.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.