Mammoth Lakes PD Wants to Up the Ante on Parking Violations – by Deb Murphy

Mammoth Lakes PD Wants to Up the Ante on Parking Violations

Mammoth Lakes Police Department presented its solution to the on-going issue of bad parking habits by both locals and visitors: make it hurt.

Some people simply use the current $45 fee for parking violations as the cost to park, explained Interim Police Chief Dan Casabian at last week’s Town Council meeting. With a few exceptions, $45 currently covers most parking violations. The exceptions are $330 for parking in a handicapped zone without the appropriate stickers, $110 for obstructing snow removal and $75 for parking at a fire hydrant or in a fire lane. Those fines will escalate to $410, $220 and $150 respectively. 

The traditional $45 fines will jump to $110. Casabian proposed a November 1 start date on the fine increases, providing enough time to let people know how seriously the Department will be taking violations. He told the Council the Department of Motor Vehicles is the higher authority on vehicular issues, including parking. If the violations are approved, Casabian said the plan included starting with warnings before the increased fee hammer falls.

Apparently, folks have come up with creative ways to get around current parking restrictions. Casabian mentioned leaving the engine running with an occupant in the car, a technique used by people who explain they just needed to run into a store to pick up something. There are currently no vehicle codes that give the picker-uppers a pass to park illegally.

Also under consideration: parking passes for locals. Casabian cited locals who move their vehicles to the street to clear their driveways.

Towing illegally parked vehicles hasn’t been very effective, Casabian explained, since the Town only has one tow vehicle. On a busy ski weekend, that lone vehicle could be hauling illegally parked vehicles all day long and still not make much of a dent. 

Council members were generally in support of the increases, as long as the Police Department mounted a strong public information effort to guarantee locals are sufficiently fore warned. 

The agenda item was information only and will be back on a future agenda for a vote.

9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David Dennison
David Dennison
1 month ago

MLPD won’t and can’t enforce parking rules….if they did, they’d get a backlash from the tourists,and from the business’ that rely on tourism… I can remember some business’ along HWY 395 complaining about speeding tickets, DUI’s and drug arrests being issued to the travelers going to Burning Man a few… Read more »

Rick O'Brien
Rick O'Brien
1 month ago
Reply to  David Dennison

The main reason for the uproar about the Burning Man people getting jacked by Mono County deputies was because they were stopping obvious burners with zero probable cause , looking for drugs , guns, and whatever else they could find . Bennett did an entire series of stories on the… Read more »

Just sayin
Just sayin
29 days ago
Reply to  Rick O'Brien

Rick, the ironic thing about that whole burning man saturation patrol issue was that it wasn’t even Ralph Obenberger (Obie) who arranged it, or had a hand in it. It was the now Lt. who arranged the whole deal. That same Lt. even put out a memo to all staff… Read more »

Pedro
Pedro
1 month ago
Reply to  David Dennison

You supported the heavy handed, often illegal, methods of law enforcement then and now. The stop and show me your papers roadblocks/checkpoints. At Bridgeport for Burners, and also the DFW requiring all traffic on the highway to submit to inspection. Not many locals complained about law enforcement doing their job.… Read more »

David Dennison
David Dennison
29 days ago
Reply to  Pedro

Pedro Don’t know what you mean by saying “you supported yada,yada,yada “… I’ve never supported “stop and show your papers”,if you’re refering to immigration.. Checkpoints, I do think they are a good idea,since I’ve seen what drinking and driving can do on a first -hand basis, long ago losing my… Read more »

Pedro
Pedro
25 days ago
Reply to  David Dennison

The sierrawave saturation patrol articles and comments are still there.

Again, no one objected to proper traffic stops. They objected to questionable “checkpoints” and improper stops.

Tinner
Tinner
1 month ago

…and another thing, you locals who are friends with some of our officers, you are no true friend when you put an officer in a position where he/she has to choose whether to cite you or not for parking illegally and as self centered as some of our visitors. You… Read more »

David Dennison
David Dennison
1 month ago
Reply to  Tinner

Tinner I can remember years ago (in the 80’s ) in Lone Pine,at Whitney Portals,tourists parking,camping and doing as they pleased while they hiked Whitney….blocking the road,trash blowing around,etc…. “No Parking” signs were ignored…..until the day came that Miller’s Towing was put to work one week-end… They hooked-up and hauled-off… Read more »

Tinner
Tinner
1 month ago

Blowing smoke, I’ll believe it when I see it. I don’t see anything changing until another tow truck is purchased and at least one or two full time parking enforcement officers are hired and they’re driving around enforcing parking violations in marked parking enforcement trucks. Until then, this is all… Read more »