Great Basin board approves Owens Lake control plan

By Deb Murphy

Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District’s Board of Directors took about an hour Wednesday morning to approve a revised State Implementation Plan to bring the Owens Lake into compliance with PM10 regulations while saving water and providing habitat values on the massive project.

Ted Schade, former Great Basin Air Pollution Control Officer, attended the meeting and tour as a private citizen, voicing his approval of the new State Implementation Plan.

Ted Schade, former Great Basin Air Pollution Control Officer, attended the meeting and tour as a private citizen, voicing his approval of the new State Implementation Plan.

The 557-pages of documentation was the product of a cooperative effort between Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and Great Basin following nearly 30 years of litigation and a lot of blood-letting.

The SIP clearly defines the area of LADWP’s responsibility, provides alternatives to shallow flooding and allows for a narrower time frame on the shallow flooding tracts. The advantages for Great Basin and air-breathing residents of Owens Valley: the district has equally well-defined protocols for enforcement.

Great Basin Air Pollution Control Officer Phill Kiddoo provided the back story, starting with water diversions in the Los Angeles Aqueduct that turned the lake bed into a dust bowl 102 years ago. In 1987, the lake bed was found to be not in compliance with federal PM10 emissions. Eleven years later, LADWP was required to fix it. By 2006 Great Basin had identified a total of 45 square miles requiring mitigation. An additional 3.6 square miles was ear-marked in 2011 igniting a law suit bonfire.

A Stipulated Judgement settled the matter, confirming the 48.6 square mile area of responsibility, limiting any additional control area to 4.8 square miles and opening the door for LADWP to save water used on the control areas.

Richard Harasick, LADWP’s director of water operations opened the public comment period with a statement of the City’s “commitment to meet its responsibilities.” That commitment, Harasick indicated, cost LADWP $1.3 billion. “I’m super excited,” he said, noting the project has provided habitat, saved water and controlled the dust. “Both agencies are happy,” he said. “The dust has settled.”

Board Chair Matt Kingsley found Harasick’s comments encouraging after a history of multiple lawsuits.

Former air pollution control officer Ted Schade commented as a “private citizen.” After reviewing all the documents, Schade said “nothing was lost, nothing is missing. I approve on behalf of the air-breathing public.” Schade credited “those who came before,” including his predecessor Ellen Hardebeck and Great Basin attorney Brian Lamb.

Board member Mary Rawson made the motion to approve the SIP and accompanying documents with minor changes; the motions passed.

In a press release issued by Great Basin, Kiddoo stated “More than 75,000 tons of dust per year have been controlled with dust mitigation implementation at Owens Lake, making this the largest air pollution project in the history of the United States.”

The plan will now be submitted to the California Air Resources Board and the federal Environmental Protection Agency for approval and adoption.

While not directly related to the SIP, Keeler residents complained of progress to reduce dust off the Keeler Dunes, specifically the placement of straw bales that created “lumpy dunes rather than rolling dunes.” Bales abandoned in and around the community were also blamed for an increase in dust mold, allergies and mice. The re-vegetation of the dunes has had a 30- to 70-percent survival rate, but the consensus was the long-term project has fallen short of its goals.

During the Board reports, Jeff Griffiths noted it was important for LADWP to extend the spirit of cooperation. “We approved the SIP because it was the right thing to do. There are a lot of right things to do, LADWP leases, mitigation projects, irrigation for ranchers in the Owens Valley and Long Valley.”

Mono County Supervisor and Great Basin Board Member Fred Stump agreed that irrigation for pastureland in Long Valley was an issue for his constituents as well. Fifty years of irrigation has provided valuable habitat for sage grouse, a species that barely escaped listing as an endangered species following a cooperative plan to protect that habitat.

Following the board meeting’s closed session, board members, staff and others got a tour of the Owens Lake.

, , , , , , ,

One Response to Great Basin board approves Owens Lake control plan

  1. Philip Anaya April 16, 2016 at 7:00 pm #

    Goodness gracious .There’s a lot of goodness going within The Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District. The excellent results that they have been able to achieve with the City of Los Angeles holding up the laws of our nation, holding the City of Los Angeles feet to the fire until finally there is this agreement to halt the pollution from the Owens Dry Lake. There is the goodness that lives will have been saved with folks no longer suffering from the effects of PM10 Emissions. Thank goodness for Mr. Schade even in retirement following up and lending his efforts and expertise .
    It is easy to be critical of the lack of goodness coming historically from the LADWP. Seventy Five years of operations that began with a diverted Owens River and a dried up 50 sq. mile lake have finally yielded this agreement , an agreement that could have been accomplished without all the derision and Court Adjudications . Seventy years of dragging their feet and poisoning out lands, poisoning the air that we breathe, a Godless act. There are many lessons here and we wonder if DWP has gotten past page one . Don’t wreck the earth , don’t cause damage that is going to need one day to be undone , don’t rob Peter to pay Paul .Respect the agreements that you have made. What’s up with the lies, the delays the mistrust that you the DWP nuture so well, for so long in the Eastern Sierra .
    In these past years while Owens Lake was being disputed, the LADWP I am told and I have observed, the LADWP has hardened it’s position with respect to the rest of the Owens Valley. There has not yet been a development of a partnership of stewardship for the Eastern Sierra . Inyo County is willing but the City still has no regard for the Eastern Sierra and it’s inhabitants whether two, four or multiple legged. If this agreement is as good as it gets and the City still continues to extract a pound of flesh from the rest of the Eastern Sierra then it is fair to offer and to tell them that all things Eastern Sierra can and will eventually be made right. You will over and over again be subjected to goodness seeking truth and justice for the Eastern Sierra.
    This agreement maybe is not complete as it could be. As Jeff Griffiths notes, “It is important for LADWP to extend a spirit of cooperation.” If this agreement does not have that follow up then this is mainly DWP once again being forced by the Courts to agree and where’s the goodness in that.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.