Public meeting on habitat designation for frogs and toads

mountain_yellow_legged_frog.jpgAs the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service moves forward with plans to designate what they call critical habitat for frogs and toads in the Eastern Sierra high country, down below citizens fear that the bureaucratic plan will halt trout plants in some lakes and hurt recreation. The Inyo Board of Supervisors scheduled a special meeting for Monday at 6pm at the Home Economics Building at the fairgrounds.

Fish and Wildlife spokesmen have said that their critical habitat designation for the yellow-legged frog and Yosemite toad will not in itself stop trout planting or access to the back country. Robert Moler, Public Information Officer for Fish and Wildlife, said that the designation would cause the Forest Service to consider its projects on federal land. He said, “Each activity is thoroughly evaluated on a case-by-case basis at the time the federal agency involved consults with the Fish and Wildlife Service.”

Fish and Wildlife wants to list the frogs and toads as endangered. Biologists say that these amphibians play a critical role in the web of life and natural food chain. They are food for snakes, birds, coyotes and bears.

In a letter to Fish and Wildlife, the Inyo Supervisors had called the critical habitat designations “premature” and a problem for the local economy. The Board will meet Monday with U.S. Fish and Wildlife, California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the US Forest Service. A County press release says that over 100,000 acres in Inyo County would be designated as critical habitat.

The Inyo Board said that Monday’s meeting will allow the public to better understand impacts and how the Forest Service might respond to the new designation. The Inyo Board provided an internet link for comments and information: Proposed Endangered Species Listing Rule (FWS-R8-ES-2013-0110 or Proposed Critical Habitat Rule (FWS-R8-ES-2013-0074; or at the County Planning link: http:inyoplanning.org/projects/USFW_YellowLeggedFrog.htm.

, , , ,

6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kerry Kriger, Ph.D.
Kerry Kriger, Ph.D.
9 years ago

Hi Philip Anaya, Yes I did make that video, but I never said that chytrid fungus was the only reason frogs are in trouble. Frogs have many threats, and the threats are not mutually exclusive. Thanks for your support of amphibian conservation efforts. it is our responsibility to prevent extinctions… Read more »

Eric Mills
Eric Mills
9 years ago

Here’s part of the problem, and one with an easy fix, had the Dept. of Fish & Wildlife the moxie to do it (they don’t, as yet): California annually imports some TWO MILLION non-native American bullfrogs for human consumption, most commercially-raised in Taiwan, and sold in various Chinatown live animal… Read more »

Mark Zero
Mark Zero
9 years ago
Reply to  Eric Mills

So this is the American Bullfrog that was introduced to California, Asia, and much of the world? Now the invasive species we introduced to California is being infected by (along with others) it’s family returning from Asia? We can’t raise or hunt enough market bullfrogs here? It’s racist to say… Read more »

Philip Anaya
Philip Anaya
9 years ago

Last night at this meeting we all heard about the Chytrid Fungus as being one of the factors for the demise of the Frogs and the Toad. I googled Chytrid Fungus and found a web site savethefrogs.com. Dr. Kerry Kreiger in the nearly 2 hour recorded webcast shares his research… Read more »

Mark
Mark
9 years ago

It was probably not wise to spend 60 years building an economy around an invasive species..

Yet that is what they want to continue to do..

Water Moccasin
Water Moccasin
9 years ago
Reply to  Mark

Mark, We do it well. Slaughtered buffalo and passenger pigeons, then raise cattle and poultry. Cut down Valley Oaks to plant grains that give less food per acre with much more work. Sheep instead of antelope. Trout instead of pupfish. Walk into the Garden of Eden and decide to tear… Read more »