DWP and Inyo talk power, solar and public opinion

michaelwebsterAt the Inyo Supervisors’ meeting Tuesday, during a break in the intense talk over the Department of Water and Power’s Solar Ranch plans south of Independence, Assistant Director of Power System Planning, Michael Webster made it clear that considering management, the Commission and the Mayor, there is clearly a chance that the project will not go. “They will weigh the pros and cons.,” he said. “Staff can’t predict where it will go.”

Rumors had persisted that maybe LA officials were re-thinking the controversial Solar Ranch of 1200 acres and a million solar panels across from Manzanar. Supervisor Matt Kingsley asked Webster directly how committed DWP is to the project and if they are thinking of changes. Webster said, “I don’t feel comfortable commenting.” Then he said, “Strategic issues have to be addressed with the manager, our Commission and the Mayor. It will be an interesting six months,” he said.

inyosups4_15Supervisor Jeff Griffiths said members of the public call the project a terrible idea that will ruin the Valley. He said, “I heard that some thought if it’s too unpopular, DWP would look for another way or place. What would public reaction have to look like for you to change this?” Webster tried to side-step the question again when he said, “Our Board will look at it. It’s ultimately a Board decision.”

When questioned by Sierra Wave Media and the LA Times during a break, Webster said there was clearly a chance the project would not go. Then he said that it has all the strategic advantages of the transmission line, economic development and job training. He said no other site meets all of those needs. Will DWP take the Owens Valley people and their objections seriously? Webster said, “Policy makers are struggling with the process.” The hint of DWP doubt about the project attracted attention in the public and on the Board.

Webster did talk through what he called DWP’s transformation on the power side. The bottom line – primarily the State mandate to generate 33% of its electricitycrowd with renewable energy sources by 2020 and the need to eliminate coal generated power plants, Webster went on to describe several solar and wind projects that have or will soon break ground in other parts of the West and contribute to LA’s power supply. He said use of the available transmission line capacity of 250 megawatts in the Owens Valley is important to DWP. He said LA generates 20% of its power with renewable energy now with the need for 13% more by 2020.

Webster did say that 40 to 50% of solar energy will happen locally in LA but is limited due to cloud cover and the need for geographical diversity. He said if solar projects are 200 miles apart, they are impacted differently by conditions. He said DWP will do a solar demonstration project of 500 kilowatts on the Owens Dry Lake this summer. Webster indicated that it would take too long to develop large-scale solar on the dry lake bed.

Webster ran through what he considers the pluses of the Solar Ranch for the Owens Valley – it would be paced over several years; it’s a passive facility; the County will get $4.6 million to cover service costs, an economic development loan of $2 million, and some job training.

Supervisor Kingsley asked about more rooftop solar in LA. Webster said that doesn’t count in the 33% mandate although DWP and other utilities are working to change that. Webster said there are concerns about the whole system and too much local solar. Supervisor Kingsley leaned on Webster to get engaged with the public more. He said, “I’m spending daily time on your project.” Supervisor Griffiths said there’s no real benefit to the local communities. He suggested that the $4.6 million payment DWP has proposed was too low, considering the impacts. Webster said the figure was arrived at through negotiations with Inyo. Anything beyond that, he said, would be a gift of public funds.

Fifteen members of the public spoke against DWP’s solar project. Perhaps most revealing was what Nancy Masters had to say on behalf of the Owens Valley Committee. She said several years ago, the idea of a conservation easement on DWP lands in Inyo was proposed. That would inhibit all development. She said, “We are proposing to protect the Owens Valley and sustain access instead of locking up 1200 acres in a solar project. We will re-visit this idea.”

Board members thanked Webster for his visit and discussion. Board Chairman Rick Pucci told the DWP man that he had never received so many comments on a project. “Most of them negative,” said Pucci. He said he hoped the public comments were registering in relation to more than just the specific Solar Ranch project. He said there are fears that if the people are not heard, more solar with the same problems will develop in the future. We will have more on comments made by citizens in later stories.

, , , ,

10 Responses to DWP and Inyo talk power, solar and public opinion

  1. Eastern Sierra Local April 16, 2014 at 8:39 am #

    The irony of the Owens Valley Committee (Masters) comments is that when LA Mayor Hahn proposed the conservation easement on DWP land in Owens Valley the local rhetoric at the time was complete opposition to that proposal with the logic that it would prevent residential and commercial business development in the Valley (primarily around communities) and forever lock out LA DWP releases of land to the private sector. Now they want to propose it again? The curious part about watching this debate unfold is how wishy washy and contradictory the locals are in the Eastern Sierra.
    They want the courthouse moved from Indy to Bishop; then the City prevents the sale of the land;
    They don’t want a conservation easement in 2005 to infringe on private development; now they do to stop a solar farm;
    They don’t ski June Mountain; yet when it’s closed they cry over the outrage;
    They didn’t want a UC University here in the 60’s; then complain about the lack of higher education in the Eastern Sierra;
    They complain about a Walmart coming to town and how it’ll kill business in town; but go out of town to save money.
    They complain about there not being sustainable employment locally; then protest any possible development of sustainable employment (Cougar Gold, Bridgeport; Solar Farm proposals; hydroelectric proposals);
    They complain about Caltrans “bypassing” Olancha; yet spend no time in Olancha themselves.

    Locals: stay consistent in your positions.

    • Ken Warner April 16, 2014 at 9:30 am #

      I like this. But it will only arouse the “Wrath of the Bloggers”:

      I didn’t know that the “Locals” killed a UC campus. That’s completely moronic. At U.C.S.D. there’s nearly 30,000 people spending money like crazy. That’s almost the total number of people living in both Inyo and Mono counties. And they all want services like beer and sandwiches and movies and books and computers and need their cars and bicycles fixed and…and…

      But the battle cry is “We Need More Tourists”. Sometimes I think that some people should not be allowed the freedom to make decisions for themselves.

      And now the Locals want to kill the initial seeds of an industry that is not only vital for the future of the Owens Valley but vital for the whole Earth.


      “A trio of United Nations-sponsored climate reports released over the past seven months point to a dangerously warming planet, but big questions remain about whether the world’s nations will take action and, ultimately, about whether the reports will matter.”

      “…the project a terrible idea that will ruin the Valley…” First it would destroy the sense of loneliness at Manzanar — now it ruins the entire Valley. Good grief!

      The Solar Ranch is 1200 acres. That’s about 0.125% of the valley. And most of the people in the Owens Valley would never even see it. What a bunch of maroons.

    • Charles James April 16, 2014 at 1:06 pm #

      People are by their nature inconsistent. It’s easy to say that you hold to a principle; that is until that principle creates a problem or inconvenience to you personally. Changing your mind or opinion isn’t necessarily being “wishy-washy” if done over a long span of time; it depends on “what it was” that changed your mind. New facts and changes in society often have a way of changing your perception of an issue.

      Besides, “Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative.” said Oscar Wilde.

      And if consistency results in predictability, where’s the fun is that?!

    • Philip Anaya April 16, 2014 at 6:36 pm #

      Ignacio ,

      Imagine Mongo, a University of California Owens Valley. We could still both have a chance to achieve even higher education at 4,000 plus feet ,even flat landers like you and me. No lie, We should revisit that idea. At the very least, we could try out for the water boy of the , no, maybe the Old Man River job in the Hydrology Department. We’d have a lot of competition for the Old Man part . There is a lot of water wise folks around in the Owens Valley. Yep, there’s a lot of wisdom in the Valley, not being heard, not being utilized . It happens in every Company Town in this land of ours. It continues until voices are united and heard and the freedom of wisdom and ideas.are allowed and nurtured . Higher Education indeed.

      • Ken Warner April 17, 2014 at 9:09 am #

        Philip: you’ll have to imagine it because it will never happen. The 60’s and 70’s was an era of expansion for the U.C. system. Since then, they’ve been strapped for money.

        I don’t know if there really was a possibility of a U.C. Owens Valley. It would have been fantastic. But it will never happen now.

      • Mongo the IDIOT April 17, 2014 at 10:47 am #

        Where’s Mongo’s comment?

        • Benett Kessler April 17, 2014 at 10:56 am #

          It’s posted. I post as I can around other work. Take heart!

          • Mongo the IDIOT April 17, 2014 at 2:10 pm #

            Thanks BK, I was speaking to Philip about his response to me which I cant see.

      • Desert Tortoise April 17, 2014 at 1:33 pm #

        Fix Cerro Coso CC and bring it up to the standard of the best community colleges in this state before you worry about a UC or a CSU. Cerro Coso does not provide the lab classes or software classes necessary for students entering an engineering program at a UC or CSU who expect to take upper division courses as a Junior. Not by a long shot. There is more to be gained by improving Cerro Coso CC, much more. Nice people there, they care about their students, but their class offerings are substandard.

    • The Aggressive Progressive April 17, 2014 at 9:35 am #

      If people didn’t stand up for the “voiceless” or what they believe in, then we would have a even more “obedient” “sheep” type society, people should be inconsistent in the way that new information and facts can change ones ideas or perspective, yes we should stay authentic to the core values we hold, but we shouldn’t be consistent to the point that it stops the people to be able to emerge with the emerging world around us..


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.