Letter to the editor: contention over renewables

 solarpanelsContention, Confrontation and Derision : The Inyo County Renewable Energy General Plan Amendment (REGPA)
On March 26, 2013, our Inyo County Board  of Supervisors approved the Desert Renewable Conservation Plan (DRECP) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with California Energy Commission (CEC).  This is the beginning of the current contentious, confrontational  and derisive atmosphere that now exists between environmentally minded Groups/Individuals and Inyo County Planning over the REGPA.  There is an explanation of how all of this has occurred the key word being “Conservation.”
   In another MOU dated November 17, 2008, between the CEC ,Caifornia Fish and Wildlife, BLM, and the US Fish and Wildlife, the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) was born.  ” The DRECP will Guide Solar and other RPS (Renewable Portfolio Standards, 33% Renewable’s by such and such a date)  energy project siting in the DRECP Planning Area and ensure conservation of California’s Natural Resources in the Planning Area” .
   In the MOU dated March 26,2013 Inyo County agreed to participate in the DRECP process.
                                      http://www.inyoplanning.org/projects/documents/DRECP_MOU-2013.03.pdf
   The MOU goals (page 3) provide for the  “Conservation”element.   Nothing in this Goals A-K section of the MOU provides for an encouragement of Industrial Scale RE Solar development in the County.  Every Goal has to do with conserving the biotic communities in the DRECP Planning Areas. The DRECP is a “conservation” preservation process to “ensure conservation of California’s Natural Resources”.   So where did the wheels fall off the wagon? Where did the bus stray from the road towards the cliff? Is “conservation”  not the key word in the DRECP goals and purpose?
   Page 4 of the MOU contains Inyo County’s goals and policy’s for the DRECP. Where was the public process establishing these tidbits?   I suggest a reading of this section of the MOU . It begins with  “Inyo County historically has provided renewable energy production facilities for the benefit of California”  What, other than some historic hydro electric and recent geo-thermal generation? How does that assumption overwhelm the stated and ignored Goals of the MOU ?
What a lead into Goals A-D .  All of a sudden, Inyo County outside of Goals of this DRECP  MOU  is using the word  “Encourage.”      Goal a. “Encourage the sound Development of any and all energy resources____ “.   Goal b.  “Encourage the use off peer review science in the assessment of Impacts____ “.   Goal c.  “Encourage the development of adequate utility corridors_____”.  Goal d.  “Encourage maintaining energy opportunities___________ with a goal to ensuring that the citizens of the County benefit  from renewable  energy development in the County”.      Goal e.   deals  with cooperative land disposition and acquisition, exchanges and adjustments that benefit the citizens of the County.   Goal f. is about access, recreation and muti-use management .
  So Inyo County is now a participant in the DRECP process. There is a Grant from the CEC to have a process to have a General Plan Amendment. The Goals of Conservation are being dragged through the  muck of the Encouragement of Industrial Scale development . The Planning Department is forging ahead , they have a deadline and a rush to judgment. The idea of benefits to the Citizens of Inyo County for the generation of renewable energy for local consumption is not adequately addressed in the REGPA. There is little benefit for Inyo County that is viable in terms of green house gases when the local environment is so severely impacted that prior mitigation Projects Boundaries like the LORP and the Long Term Water Agreement are not considered and respected by Planning Department Heads and Staff . The contention of the Environmental groups and individuals is predictable and correct .
 There is little foresight, little logic, little compliance with the Goals and the existence of the DRECP and the MOU being exercised in this current Planning Process.  The peer review science provided by these “extreme vocal minority sage, rabbit brush lovers is being ignored , rejected  and marginalized for the idea of development at any cost.  Children know the song “the wheels of the Bus go round and round.”  Inyo County needs to check their lug nuts and get that bus back on the path  “all through the Town”.  I hope our Board of Supervisors are hearing our words. I hope that they hear the facts presented, can tolerate the emotional and logical outrage of their constituents and that they send Mr. Hart and his “alternatives”  back to a adequate public process and Planning drawing board even before the March 18 Board Meeting . I also suggest a larger venue for this March 18th Board Meeting.
                                                                                         Philip Anaya
                              
11 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Philip Anaya
Philip Anaya
8 years ago

DT, I should have been reading these documents before writing a word. A friend sent me this link http://www.inyoplanning.org/RenewableProjects-Other.htm At the bottom of the DRECP heading , dated Oct. ,2009 there is a link to a letter from the previous Inyo County Board of Supervisors to the CEC http://www.inyoplanning.org/documents/RenewLtrCEC10.20.09-2.pdf This… Read more »

Desert Tortoise
Desert Tortoise
8 years ago
Reply to  Philip Anaya

A solar project in the Indian Wells Valley that was going to be developed by Solar Millenium was stopped due to the choice of undisturbed desert tortoise and Mojave ground squirrel habitat. It is not impossible to stop a solar project, but the reasons have to be very compelling and… Read more »

Desert Tortoise
Desert Tortoise
8 years ago

The following is taken verbatim from the 1979 California Solar Solar Rights Act. “Section 65850.5 (c) of the act also prohibits local governments from denying a use permit for a solar energy system “. . . unless it makes written findings based upon substantial evidence in the record that the… Read more »

Desert Tortoise
Desert Tortoise
8 years ago

Ah yes, thumbs down for quoting the relevant law. The Owens Valley illiterati at their finest.

Inyoite
Inyoite
8 years ago

Desert Tortoise – the reason people gave you a thumbs down is because you conveniently took paragraph (c) of that Government Code Section out of context. You obviously read the whole Section in order to extract just that specific paragraph, so you know that it was written to encourage small… Read more »

Mongo The Idiot
Mongo The Idiot
8 years ago

Honorable Desert Tortoise, Worry less about literacy and more about human spirit. In the end those you labeled as inferior may be your caregivers. You will surely encounter many of them who prepare your food, wait on your table, and perform other tasks you have the luxury of hiring out.… Read more »

Desert Tortoise
Desert Tortoise
8 years ago

That all sounds nice but it is perfectly worthless if you don’t understand how the laws work. Without that minimal understanding, you will bang your head against the wall for a very long time. We read all these anguished letters here, and yet no one seems aware that the reason… Read more »

Mongo The Idiot
Mongo The Idiot
8 years ago

My understanding was that the BoS review process was necessary to gain variances and re-zoning so that the projects could go forward.
If there were no variance or re-zoning necessary then BoS due process of public, environmental, and cultural review would not happen.
Mongo

Desert Tortoise
Desert Tortoise
8 years ago

I am including a link to the California Energy Commission website that in turn has a link to the Memorandum of Understanding between the CEC and BLM regarding the approval process for large solar power installations. http://www.energy.ca.gov/siting/solar/index.html Click on the link “Memorandum of Understanding” underlined in the text. If you… Read more »

Ken Warner
Ken Warner
8 years ago

“The state does not want county or local governments putting up road blocks”

And wisely so given the emotional irrationalism that some groups tend to become infected with, …”tolerate the emotional and logical outrage of their constituents …”

How did we ever build the railroads???

Desert Tortoise
Desert Tortoise
8 years ago
Reply to  Ken Warner

Railroads were given twenty square miles of free Federal land for every mile of rail laid. The Railroad Subsidy is the reason that the railroads were and may still be the largest private land owners in the US. The funny and sad thing is that many of those companies made… Read more »