MONO COUNTY, Calif. (DECEMBER 06, 2022) – Mono County has recently seen a surge in both Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and Influenza (Flu) disease activity, In addition, Mono County Public Health is anticipating an additional increase in COVID-19 (Coronavirus) infection heading into the holiday season. As a result, Mono County Public Health is urging residents and visitors to take precautions, and seek appropriate care when ill.
“The winter viruses have arrived earlier than expected, and are trending to remain active
longer than usual this winter season,” said Dr. Caryn Slack, MD, MPH, Mono County
Health Officer. “A triple threat of Flu, COVID-19, and RSV has descended upon Mono
County, and simple proactive measures can help prevent and reduce local spread.”
Craig Burrows, MD, Chief Medical Officer at Mammoth Hospital adds, “Masking is a
very simple intervention to prevent the spread of other viral illnesses besides COVID-19.
If you are symptomatic with congestion, sneezing and coughing, and have to go out in
public, please wear a mask to protect other people you come in contact with.”
According to a news release from the California Department of Public Health (CDPH),
RSV, Flu, and COVID-19 are impacting Californians earlier than usual this year, and
residents are encouraged to “continue being vigilant in preventing the rapid spread of
winter viruses.” The release urges residents to “protect themselves with vaccinations for
Flu and COVID-19, to stay home when sick and to wear masks.”
While the surge is evident based upon rising hospitalization numbers and increased
volume of outpatient/Emergency Department visits for these illness’ symptoms, the
actual levels of RSV, Flu, and COVID-19 disease in the community are difficult to
quantify. Residents and visitors are asked to report their positive at-home COVID-19
tests via the CDPH portal: https://primary.health/cdph/ to more accurately track local
COVID-19 infection.
Influenza (Flu) Vaccine
Flu vaccines have been shown to reduce the risk of flu illness, hospitalization, and death.
Similar to wearing a mask, the flu vaccine protects the vaccinated person and the people
around them. Getting a flu vaccine can also save healthcare resources. Flu vaccination is
part of a comprehensive public health strategy to reduce the burden of flu, and helps to
preserve scarce healthcare resources for the care of patients with COVID-19.
Benefits of Flu Vaccination:
• Help keep you and your loved ones out of the hospital;
• Help preserve scarce medical resources to care for COVID-19 patients; and,
• Protect frontline healthcare workers who will be caring for people sick with
respiratory illnesses this fall and winter.
COVID-19 Bivalent Vaccine Booster
In August 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) amended the emergency
use authorizations (EUAs) of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine and the Pfizer-BioNTech
COVID-19 Vaccine to authorize bivalent formulations of the vaccines for use as a single
booster dose at least two months following primary or booster vaccination. This updated
booster provides better protection against COVID-19 caused by the Omicron Variant.
“The bivalent booster is recommended for individuals age 12 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and
older who are at least two months out from completing their primary series, or receiving
their original booster(s),” said Dr. Caryn Slack, MD, MPH, Mono County Health
Officer. “The development of this updated booster follows the influenza platform that
has been in place for decades, essentially using a scientific formula to enhance the
existing recipe and strengthen the vaccine’s protection against the COVID-19 strain as it
has evolved. We are experiencing a 90 percent efficacy rate with the bivalent booster
locally.”
Bivalent COVID-19 Booster Eligibility:
• Individuals 18 years of age and older are eligible for a single booster dose of the
Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent if it has been at least two months since
they have completed primary vaccination or have received the most recent booster
dose with any authorized or approved monovalent COVID-19 vaccine.
• Individuals 12 years of age and older are eligible for a single booster dose of the
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent if it has been at least two months
since they have completed primary vaccination or have received the most recent
booster dose with any authorized or approved monovalent COVID-19 vaccine.
It remains safe to receive COVID-19 vaccines and flu shots at the same time.
For more information, questions, or concerns, please call Mono County Public Health at
(760) 924-1830 or follow up with your pediatrician or medical provider.
Discover more from Sierra Wave: Eastern Sierra News - The Community's News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Corporate bureaucratic medical professionals continuing to push these fallacies. Lost trust.
Myocarditis, blood clots, miscarriages on significant rise. Vaccinated?
Keep masking even though it provides no protection to a respiratory virus.
Size of viral particles and size of mask filter medium?
Let’s find out shall we?
You can’t reason with them Bob. Their minds belong to the state and mainstream media which does the thinking for them. Let them get their poison injections if they want them. Get ready for war if/when they try to implement injection passports again.
If you are a member of a demographic that is unusually vulnerable to Covid (elderly, with heart disease/diabetes), please do not be lured into thinking it is safe to attend public events or go to indoor public places in reliance on masks, either worn by you or by others. These public “health” “experts” do not tell you that the only two randomized controlled trials on masks and Covid showed that even high grade surgical masks fail to provide statistically significant protection (Denmark, published November 2020 in Annals of Internal Medicine), or that cloth masks do not work at all and high grade surgical masks provide at best 10% reduction in transmission (Bangladesh, Science magazine, December 2021). If you are in a vulnerable cohort, keep this in mind.
The Denmark study DID NOT conclude that masks were worthless – you obviously did not read it or your comprehension is deficient. . And the Bangladesh study? Here – let me help you out on this one:
Conclusion:
A randomized-trial of community-level mask promotion in rural Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic shows that the intervention increased mask usage and reduced symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections, demonstrating that promoting community mask-wearing can improve public health.
Try reading something other than “social media” and your morning toilet paper. And remember to flush.
Mono, where’s your data from Denmark study? I did read that, but can’t remember the numbers. Something like mask wearers were infected 1.2% less then non-mask. I also don’t remember if they listed different kinds of masks. Not much of a reduction in infection.
The data from the Denmark study is not mine – it belongs to the agency who funded the study. And I am gonna guess you read the social media version of the study.
The risk reduction for mask wearers was 18% (1.8% of mask wearers infected, 2.1% in the control group) but because of the sample size and short length of the study, as well as some other features in the design of the study, that percentage was statistically inconclusive.
Here is the conclusion:
Bundgaard, et al.: Our results suggest that the recommendation to wear a surgical mask when outside the home among others did not reduce, at conventional levels of statistical significance, the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in mask wearers in a setting where social distancing and other public health measures were in effect, mask recommendations were not among those measures, and community use of masks was uncommon. Yet, the findings were inconclusive and cannot definitively exclude a 46% reduction to a 23% increase in infection of mask wearers in such a setting. It is important to emphasize that this trial did not address the effects of masks as source control or as protection in settings where social distancing and other public health measures are not in effect.
As to your “not much of a reduction” – regardless of what the numbers were and are these were and are real living people who sickened and died or are suffering “long covid”. Only a sociopath would ignore that reality in favor of misunderstanding and misinterpreting the methodology of a scientific study in order to argue against something as simple as putting on a mask.
No smarticus, I read the paper in its entirety. I can do that, and understand, not like you, who only quotes others and when called out, hurls insults.
Only a Sociopath would recommend ineffective measures like the current vaccines and boosters, and/or masking to people at risk. Give them a pacifier and watch them die while listening to the garbage from CDC. Brainwashing. That said, most of us aren’t at risk.
Oh, BTW Mono Resident, you are quoting the study, therefore it is “your” data, or argument. If you’re gonna quote, stand by “your” data. Now you are saying you are not using this data as a reference to prove your point.
From what you say, risk reduction would be 0.3 %, but you are forgetting to add the cohort numbers, which somehow is giving you an 18% reduction? Show us the numbers! From what I remember, there were very small infection numbers in the entire group, masked or not. One percent of one percent isn’t a whole lot of proof!
BTW again, why are there so few studies about masking? Because it is silly and ineffective. But please, suffocate yourself with your mask as you choose. I suggest saran wrap, much less porous than plain cloth.
Let them eat cake, eh?
PS: I don’t think Bundgaard was in the original study, that is someone else reanalyzing the results. Please provide actual references so those of us who want to can look it up.
PPS: And when confronted with data that doesn’t fit your hypothesis, just forget any science and just start whining about the those who are dead. How about those who were sickened and killed by the vaccines? People who actually died from comorbidities but were listed as Covid casualties because they were tested positive, even though they weren’t sick from covid?
PPPS: I only hope to God that you are just pretending to know anything about science or medicine and not one of our local providers. But, Hey, it wouldn’t surprise me, thats why we all have to go out of town for real medical care!!!!
Bundgaard was an author – in fact two of them were. Your 0.3% is using grade school math to attempt to critique a statistical analysis of an epidemiological study. If you really had an “advanced degree in science” as you said to us in the past (and then disappeared when a couple of us asked what field and what you had published) you would understand this. Oh yeah – look it up yourself. If you already read it you should know how to do that.
But to be frank this tirade of yours, with all of it’s psychological projection AND a suggestion that I kill myself with saran wrap is very clear sign of some kind of psychological distress. May I suggest that you check yourself into a psych ward?
Sierra Wave – Hell? anyone there? Don’t you think telling someone to commit suicide is worthy of banning?
Can you say fifty-one-fifty? I knew you could!
mono resident
Don’t think “ask a parent” is a 51-50….
He’s just thinking and doing what and how he’s been “told” to do and think …not nothing on his own…what seems about 29 % (and dropping ) of the American people, for some reason, continue to do…