City of Bishop addresses empty-storefront issues

By Deb Murphy

Monday’s Bishop City Council workshop was to focus on a proposed property value protection ordinance, but the civilians who addressed the council came up with other ways to solve the issue of far too many vacant store fronts in the downtown core.

City Administrator Jim Tatum and Associate Planner Elaine Kabala explained the city’s concept of an ordinance was not punitive, rather a way to encourage property owners to do something to erase a semi-blighted look to downtown.

According to Kabala, 22 storefronts are vacant on Line, Warren and Main streets. Fourteen of those are actively for sale or rent, the balance seem to be used for storage. Most were owned by local residents.

Kabala summarized those vacancies: some were in good condition but unrealistically priced, others were too big or in bad shape. The old Main Street Kmart site accounted for almost half of the 130,000 square feet of empty. Plus, the lease is protective of Vons, the owner.

Many of the speakers stressed the cost to bring the older buildings up to code. As Tatum described it: there are 1940 buildings competing in a 2017 world.

Another issue was the lack of smaller sites for business start-ups. An idea that had a lot of traction was to take a storefront like the former JCPenney, gut it, put in ADA-compliant restrooms and subdivide into smaller cubicles.

Amanda Kavanis of Nakid Imagination, an outdoor-focused t-shirt business, does all her selling online, but the idea of a hundred-square-feet plus cubicle was appealing. “The size of some of the available spaces are intimidating and challenging,” she said. “The square foot rate is reasonable” but the size puts the locations out of range.

Gigi De Jong and several others involved in the arts liked the idea of developing a showcase for artists. A former ballet instructor who taught through the city’s Parks and Rec. program, De Jong explained that other teachers were fighting for space to conduct their classes. One solution was for the city to lease downtown space so activities and classes could be expanded.

A three business owner, Cindy Meinke Schoener looked into renting one of the currently vacant spaces but the cost to bring the site up to code was prohibitive.

The solutions won’t come from a government ordinance,” said Robin Bolser, owner of Great Basin Bakery. “Ideas have to come from the community. To survive we have to get creative.”

Stan Smith of Pleasant Valley Realty suggested the city take the workshop to the real estate, property owner, banking and private investor communities. Tatum said the intent was to hold additional workshops. “Is it important enough for those communities to come here?” he asked.

Following public input, Mayor Pro-Tem Karen Schwartz agreed the community could solve the problem. “We have people with businesses, we have the space. There’s just a disconnect. We have to bring everyone together and come up with creative solutions.”

The next workshop is scheduled for the Council’s January 8 meeting.

, , ,

16 Responses to City of Bishop addresses empty-storefront issues

  1. BishopAndRook December 30, 2017 at 1:49 am #

    Y’all need to enable some silicon valley/SF companies to relocate to Bishop. It has to be an interesting proposition at least. Cheaper housing, talent availability, or relocate people. Sure beats Sunnyvale

  2. UpHigh December 8, 2017 at 5:27 pm #

    Just wait till a Dollar Store comes, that would destroy Bishop.

  3. Allen Berrey December 8, 2017 at 11:05 am #

    Thank you Almost Native. Then perhaps we should revisit the location where “they” (the Administrative Office of the Courts, I presume) wanted to put the new courthouse.

    (It seems the AOC created its own destiny: it picked a location in downtown that would remove a major parking lot in order to justify building a new, multi-million dollar building on open land at the very northern end of town).

    It is my belief that the City of Bishop and the Superior Court could work together and build for their respective purposes an attractive and efficient two-story building on the existing footprint of the court and city offices – plus the largely unused “gazebo area” on the north side of the building – without impacting the adjacent parking lot.

    And, with respect to parking, perhaps the State of California could build a second story of parking over some or all of that existing lot. This could provide better parking in downtown Bishop not just for day-to-day use but also for events like Mule Days, football games, etc.


  4. p ite December 8, 2017 at 9:03 am #

    charles well put, in all the western states there sre only 5 donor states wash, ore, cal ,colo,and texas, the rest are reciever states, yes most red states couldnt make it without fed dollars, which is funny how red states are so adamant about their independence, all of these states are in financial trouble yet they want the federal lands that they could not support, but they would gladly sell to the highest bidder, which may not even be american, america is for sale.

  5. Almost Native December 8, 2017 at 8:57 am #

    Allen, the problem is, if they built it where they wanted to, it would have used the only large parking lot on that side of town. town. Why they didn’t put it in the old Kmart building is beyond me?

  6. Allen Berrey December 7, 2017 at 8:22 am #

    The demise of Bishop’s downtown will be exacerbated by the inane decision of the California Superior Court to build a new courthouse on open land on the north end of town, at the intersection of Highways 6 and 395, which will draw commercial activity away from downtown.

    Conversely, if a new courthouse were built at or near its existing location in Bishop, the State of California would have to pay to upgrade the infrastructure in the area, to the benefit of all, and would have kept Court-related commerce in downtown Bishop.

    Or has that grand plan been abandoned?



    • Correction December 8, 2017 at 11:19 am #

      It’s a County building, not a Courthouse. So let your supervisors know the idea sucks before it’s too late.

  7. INYOFACE December 5, 2017 at 12:20 pm #

    When i moved to Bishop in 1992 it was intact.
    You could look up and down Main street on any day of the week after 6 pm and not see any traffic at all . But As the state of Ca decided to basically allow the unfettered influx of over 30 million illegal aliens (12 Million is Liberal Propaganda) to continue unabated . The Demographics have dramatically changed . 1000s of Companies and Corporations have fled to greener pastures, hundreds of thousands of Families have moved to other States. And the Politicians in Sacramento will never be able to TAX or Fine their way out of the Fact that they have BOILED the Calf in its own Mothers Milk .
    Liberalism is a Mental Disorder.

    • Charles O. Jones December 7, 2017 at 9:29 pm #

      The USA has the largest economy in the world. It is followed, (in order) by China, Japan, Germany, UK and California. Yes, CA’s GDP is greater than all but five countries on this planet.

      Furthermore, for every dollar CA contributes in federal taxes we receive roughly 78 cents back in federal services. Many states (including many red states) are just the opposite. They receive far more in federal services than they actually pay for in federal taxes. So for years now, CA’s economic engine has been helping subsidize those states with less than robust economies.

      All of that aside, yes, CA has it’s share of problems, all states do. But nobody is holding a gun to your head. If your so dissatisfied with California then go find your greener pasture elsewhere. You might enjoy one of those struggling red states that CA helps provide for. Of course liberalism would be less common there. So you’d have to find something else to blame your frustrations on.

  8. mark vincent December 4, 2017 at 11:15 am #

    this town needs a vibrant musuc scene and I am going to get it started ! Mark Vincent /Eastern Sierra Entertainment . please call if you want to get involved 760 924-0000

  9. Almost Native December 4, 2017 at 10:50 am #

    Any body else remember when our planning commission tried to reroute all our traffic around Bishop? Just for thought.

  10. Dpblue December 4, 2017 at 8:24 am #

    Hey Dave hope all is well in Texas.
    You could come back and work on my cars. We miss you. One of your old customers.

  11. Roger December 2, 2017 at 10:20 am #

    As other cities are finding out online has replaced brick and mortar stores. Malls are being used for gyms and workout areas. Times are changing.

  12. p ite December 2, 2017 at 8:31 am #

    for the good of the community eminent domain ,power to the people

  13. David K Roberts December 2, 2017 at 6:35 am #

    Downtown Bishop used to be a wonderful thriving place until the Bishop City council decided to annex the property at the north end of town onto the city limits. Then they basically held hands with a developer and ultimately ended up with the two bog box stores, A larger K mart and yes, a larger Vons store. It was then, and still is all about additional sales and property tax revenue. And all at the expense of the smaller ma and pa businesses that made Bishop- Bishop for what,100 years.
    We watched the downtown sector start deteriorating almost immediately because they couldn’t compete. Bishop is a wonderful small, rather remote town dependent upon tourism , and that will never grow, thankfully because of being surrounded by DWP lands.
    I lived in Bishop from 1970 to 2005 and have watched it all transpire. Today’s culture and business environment have drastically changed, and yet the population of the city and county really hasn’t changed since I moved there in 1970! You can have all the meetings you want to try and take it back, but it’s not going to work. What’s done is done! Sad
    Respectfully, David K & Julie Roberts. Leander Texas

  14. Tinner December 1, 2017 at 8:07 pm #

    “unrealistically priced”
    Ya think?


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.