Appellate Court Ruling Stops Long Valley Dewatering Ruling Affirms Legal Principles Sought by Mono County and Sierra Club

 

PRESS RELEASE FROM MONO COUNTY ADMINISTRATON COUNSEL

MONO COUNTY, Calif. (JULY 5, 2022) – Late last week, the First District Court of Appeal for the State of California reversed a March 2021 Alameda Superior Court ruling requiring the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) to continue to provide water for wildlife habitat and scenic, recreational and economic resources on approximately 6,100 acres of land in Mono County — at least until such time as LADWP completes the required environmental review.

While the appellate court ruling initially appeared to be a setback for Mono County and the Sierra Club, who filed the lawsuit under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the result is in fact an affirmation of the legal principles which the County and Sierra Club sought to enforce from the beginning – that LADWP cannot remove all water from the land under the guise of expired leases from 2010, without conducting any environmental review.

“During the course of the appeal, LADWP repeatedly represented to the court that it would not
dry out lands in Long Valley and Little Round Valley without performing the required
environmental review” said Stacey Simon, Mono County Counsel. “In other words, LADWP
conceded that it must conduct environmental review prior to drying out these valleys.”

The appellate court memorialized LADWP’s concession in its ruling, thereby establishing a legal framework under which LADWP must conduct environmental review if it pursues its previouslyannounced plan to dewater Long Valley. “The court’s language is a vindication and endorsement of the principles which Mono County and Sierra Club sought to enforce in their initial complaint,” said Larry Silver, attorney for the Sierra Club.

The appellate court clearly took a different route than the trial court, holding LADWP to its own
statements, rather than issuing a direct order to limit its future actions. However, under either
approach, LADWP cannot dry out Long Valley and Little Round Valley without first conducting
environmental review as required by CEQA.

Consistent with the appellate court ruling, Mono County expects that LADWP will continue to
provide water to its leased landsin the region, even while drought conditions and climate change continue to be factors in the amount provided, as in prior years. This outcome is in line with a solution which Mono County had suggested to LADWP leadership prior to initiating litigation.

From the beginning, Mono County has attempted to work with LAWDP to seek collaborative
solutions and to steward the watershed that serves us all. “Litigation was a last resort to protect
the land, water, and wildlife in Long Valley,” explained Bob Gardner, Chair of the Mono County
Board of Supervisors. “Mono County maintains its commitment to working with the City of Los
Angeles and LADWP in a shared effort to make the most effective and efficient use of California’s limited water resources in a manner that preserves environmental and economic values and serves the needs of all Californians.

However, if further litigation becomes necessary due to LADWP’s disregard for the appellate court’s ruling and repudiation of its own statements to that court, then Mono County is prepared to take further legal action to protect its valuable natural and economic resources.”

 

3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Earl Duran
Earl Duran
1 month ago

Read the updates. Revised

Masked Locals
Masked Locals
1 month ago

Does anybody out there really think that draining Mono & Inyo counties dry is going to solve L.A.’s water issues for 25+million (and growing) people??

Thirsty
Thirsty
1 month ago

DWP. water. 💰…