Letter to the Editor: Unincorporation whispers

mammothDear Editor,

Should the Town of Mammoth Lakes unincorporate?

First, we want to pass on a tidbit of information that we learned a few years back while on the peer resort tour for the TOML. One evening in Whistler, having a cocktail with a former councilman and first town attorney, he revealed to us that the town would actually be better off if unincorporated! We asked why, of course. His answer was in part what we learned about how Whistler is governed. It is a special assessment district within the province. If the TOML were unincorporated it could be a special assessment area for Tourism & Recreation in the State of California. If the TOML had taken this path, the unincorporated TOML would keep much more of its own property taxes in town. This is big, because as it is now, the majority of property tax dollars go to the county and are spent outside of Mammoth Lakes. By state law, the county would be required to put more tax dollars back into the unincorporated Mammoth Lakes area. State spending on the unincorporated ML area would be another benefit; as well as no more spending on a redundant police force, excessive town staff, or town vehicles. The town could remain the same but without all the extra drama and expenses.

So we believe that the answer is a resounding YES! Town Council should form a committee to oversee a non-partisan consultant (NOT TOWN STAFF) to review the issues and options and present possible next steps and solutions. i.e. Bankruptcy and how it could affect the 42 million dollar lawsuit.

Our hope is that the underground rumblings by the citizens of Mammoth Lakes will become a loud outcry of voices, that the strong feelings and sentiments and opinions will be stated out loud, in public and not in whispers or behind closed doors. The solutions for the future of Mammoth Lakes should come from the citizens of Mammoth Lakes, not just a handful of politicians and staff members. The more informed, the better. So get out there and listen, learn and make yourselves heard!

Ruth and Warren. Harrell

Mammoth Lakes Homeowners and Voters

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

13 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Observer
Observer
9 years ago

The debt would still be owed by the area encompassed by the former boundary of TOML were it to dis- incorporate. No solution there.

Ken Warner
Ken Warner
9 years ago
Reply to  Observer

“…owed by the area…”???? So “areas” have become a new rural entity? Interesting. I have an “area” in my driveway that I would like to squeeze a little more money from. How do I do that exactly? Can I have my Area Council declare a special assessment district for my… Read more »

Observer
Observer
9 years ago
Reply to  Ken Warner

See the last paragraph of page 4 in this PDF link. They call it territory not area, but the meaning is the same.
http://www.calafco.org/docs/Municipal_Disincorporation_in_California-Knox.pdfu

Observer
Observer
9 years ago
Reply to  Observer

Sorry, take off the u at the end of the URL and you will have a good link.

What the ...?
What the ...?
9 years ago

You are right on, Ken Warner. From day one, its always been the developers and their yes-men, the town council (I wonder what piece of the pie they got?), that put the town in the F-upped position it is in today. And two of the original culprits on the airport… Read more »

Ken Warner
Ken Warner
9 years ago

Well, I live in Mammoth Lakes and I suggested dis-incorporation a year ago. This town was created to serve the big developers. If one steps back and looks at what the town governance really does, it just enables development that really doesn’t do the people of Mammoth Lakes all that… Read more »

Just the facts
Just the facts
9 years ago

Why in the _____ would Mono County, which Dave Wilbrecht left in terrific shape under his watch, want to buy back the mess some greedy developers created? Hold the responsible parties’ feet to the fire. Don’t shrug the problem off on the County. Grill the two councilman who had part… Read more »

wayback
wayback
9 years ago

THANK YOU
Not Enough Info, I thought I was the only one who caught this.

Not enough info
Not enough info
9 years ago

Ruth and Warren Harrell in their letter like to post some interesting info after their names: “Mammoth Lakes Homeowners and Voters.” They do not mention their permanent residence is NOT Mammoth Lakes but in Seal Beach or Costa Mesa (someplace in the L.A. area). I hope they aren’t claiming they… Read more »

Tourbillon
Tourbillon
9 years ago

So your point is that only permanent TOML residents – like the ones that got us into this mess – deserve to have their opinions considered? That really hasn’t gotten us very far now, has it? So instead of gratuitous personal attacks against folks expressing what might be good ideas,… Read more »

Not enough info
Not enough info
9 years ago
Reply to  Tourbillon

“…gratuitous personal attacks?” “…worthless innuendo?” “bad karma bile”? Sorry Tourbillon, me thinks thou doth protest too much. Simply stating the law re: those who may be breaking the law by voting in Mammoth Lakes when they don’t even live here while insisting on measures like cutting the “redundant “Mammoth Lakes… Read more »

Tourbillon
Tourbillon
9 years ago

I do not know the Harrells. I’m not sure if their proposal makes sense. Unlike you, I’m willing to think about what they say without personal attacks. I suggest you set aside the hate that is driving you and employ any intellect you might have to helping to find a… Read more »

upthecreek
upthecreek
9 years ago

and your point is?

I think the idea from Ruth and Warren. Harrel is great
No matter where they call home.